Gulliver's Travels goes towards the literary movement reading challenge and the hard core re-reading challenge.
Synopsis from Goodreads: 'I felt something alive moving on my left leg ... when bending my Eyes downwards as much as I could. I perceived it to be a human Creature not six inches high' Shipwrecked and cast adrift, Lemuel Gulliver wakes to find himself on Lilliput, an island inhabited by little people, whose height makes their quarrels over fashion and fame seem ridiculous. His subsequent encounters - with the crude giants of Brobdingnag, the philosophical Houyhnhnms and the brutish Yahoos - give Gulliver new, bitter insights into human behaviour. Swift's savage satire view mankind in a distorted hall of mirrors as a diminished, magnified and finally bestial species, presenting us with an uncompromising reflection of ourselves.Never before have I disliked a book so much. Never before have I wondered so much how on earth a book was a classic. This was even a re-read for me! WHY WAS I RE-READING THIS????? I get that it's a satire. But the satire, as my Dad agreed with me in saying, is largely lost on modern day, which in my opinion, rather negates it being a classic as classics are always relevant. I did get some of the satire, but not much of it, and I highly doubt most people my age would get any of it. Some of this satire on government was humorous. Also, some of... no, I'd say most of... the satire was just dumb. Additionally, there seems to be an extreme lack of God in this book.
Gulliver aggravates me to no end! He's absolutely full of himself! I was actually somewhat happy when he gets compared to a Yahoo.... I liked him being take down a notch. Incidentally though that section is my least favorite of the book. The fact that he doesn't want to go home to his family makes me MAD. The fact that when he gets home he doesn't even want to associate with his family disgusts me. All of the other times when he got back from strange lands he was a little disoriented at first but then he recovered quickly but apparently not this time! I feel sorry for his family as never in the whole book does he seem to have any particular love for them.
I reconciled myself slightly to Gulliver about halfway through the book when I realized it was like Mr. Collins (from Jane Austen's Pride and Prejudice) was writing a story about himself as the hero and his travels. Then it made a lot more sense. Trust me, the book gets a bit better when you think about it that way. Sometimes Guiliver would say something and I'd think "That's just what Mr. Collins would say!" However, it only made it a little bit more bearable.
The book was really boring. I mean REALLY boring! Gulliver drones on and on about stuff that nobody cares about that he thinks we care about. I read that it's considered a satire on "traveler's tale" which maybe the reason for that but it's still not good!
Side note- Far too many references to urinating and defecating were included in the book that just made me wonder WHY???? They weren't important! They were just disturbing most of the time. Don't even get me started on the women of Brobdingnag and all that went on there! If you've read it you know!
If you don't understand how much I dislike this book at this point you haven't been reading been reading this review! This is my least favorite book of all time and never before have I rated a book one star on Goodreads until now. I was telling my father how much I hated it and he told me that he too did which consoled me a lot. When I read it the first time back in high school, I was reading it for school and my Dad said he was sorry he had us read it. I've already decided I'm never making my kids read it!
Follow my blog with Bloglovin
I read this last year for my book club and felt the same way. Long. Slow. Didn't enjoy it.
ReplyDeleteSorry you didn't enjoy but I'm glad I'm not the only one. :)
DeleteThanks for the review! I was actually finding it rather humorous (NOT the story or any of your misadventures reading it), but because it's one of those books my mother decided years ago that we Weren't Going to Read (and then she's since not been able to remember quite why she'd decided that -- other than that it was kind of a waste of time ;)). I remember getting an abridged version a while ago and thinking it just looked a bit boring so I sent it back to the library unread. So your review was super helpful and perfectly detailed and (most thankfully) I'll now officially skip adding it to my TBR list! :)
ReplyDeleteThat's funny! I hope I never forget why I hate it.
DeleteI'm glad I could influence you away from the book. :)
I read Gullivers Travels a couple of years ago but it did not include the land of Houyhnhnms and Yahoos and didn't have any of the "potty talk" or other stuff you mentioned. It must have been abridged!
ReplyDeleteI do remember that he left his family a lot though, which is sad. :( Thanks for providing an honest review!
I think I would have appreciated this abridged version a little more. :)
DeleteThis was a required read for me in school, and I really didn't like it either. I've never once been tempted to reread it :) But I did enjoy reading your review of it :)
ReplyDeleteI'm glad you enjoyed it. :) It was very heartfelt. ;)
DeleteBoring boring boring boring boring. The book, not your review -- that made me chuckle :-)
ReplyDeleteHa! Thanks! :)
DeleteMy thoughts on the book EXACTLY! Funny though, I've just started re-reading it as well.
ReplyDelete~Chloe
Your rating popped up in my Goodreads feed today, so I had to check it out. I've not read this, but I did read (for college) or rather was assigned to read some short essays of Swift, not sure I read all of them, they were so GROSS (A Lady's Dressing Room, and A Modest proposal).
ReplyDelete(Um, your professor did point out that "A Modest Proposal" was satire that aimed to point out the wealthy people's heartless attitudes toward the poor, and that "A Lady's Dressing Room" was satire that was pointing out that men need to stop expecting women to be perfect angels and women need to stop pretending their bodies don't exist, right?)
DeleteI know it's satire (maybe I just don't like satire, I've struggled with Trollope also . . . but he didn't find it necessary to be vile).
DeleteI'm not sure everyone's on the same page about A Lady's Dressing room, I know my professor mentioned Mary Wollenstonecraft's answering response. I got the idea some people took it as Swift's spite towards women. Or at least that's how it came across even if he necessarily didn't aim for it. But all points of satire aside. Grossness wasn't necessary, apparently that's a thing with him.
I do feel I need a formal lesson in satire or something, or a better historical perspective whenever I read it (or maybe an author I would "get" better, I sort of thought JA was satire to an extent), I normally feel like I don't bring too much of my modern mind to reading, but I just don't "get" satire. Or maybe I assume I'm supposed to laugh? I find tons of humor, sarcastic commentary (which I would've considered related to satire) funny, but not what I've read of satire.
Okay, whew! Because if you hadn't realized/been warned they were satire, then yeaaaaah, I can see that they'd be extraordinarily off-putting.
DeleteJane Austen definitely has a satirical slant. Her books do make me laugh, especially how she punctures the absurdity of societal practices, many of which remind me of stuff we do today. However other things that are considered satire often annoy me, especially George Orwell's stuff. So I get that.